<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JBoss Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/</link>
	<description>Bob Blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:01:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James  Governor</title>
		<link>http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-13666</link>
		<dc:creator>James  Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/#comment-13666</guid>
		<description>Touche&#039; Pierre. I appreciate the difference, for sure, but there are other FAR MORE &quot;corporate&quot; companies that do blog in an energetic, personal, style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touche&#8217; Pierre. I appreciate the difference, for sure, but there are other FAR MORE &#8220;corporate&#8221; companies that do blog in an energetic, personal, style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Fricke</title>
		<link>http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-13544</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Fricke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/#comment-13544</guid>
		<description>For me it is really simple - JBoss was a private company and taking Marc&#039;s lead it was easy to be more controversial and stimulate debate in the blog.  Red Hat is a conservative public company (at least, and especially, when it comes to PR) and as one of the spokespeople, I am taking a conservative approach until I understand the boundaries better. I&#039;ve worked for private companies for seven years, so it is an adjustment.

I HAVE slipped some things in here and there though :-) ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it is really simple &#8211; JBoss was a private company and taking Marc&#8217;s lead it was easy to be more controversial and stimulate debate in the blog.  Red Hat is a conservative public company (at least, and especially, when it comes to PR) and as one of the spokespeople, I am taking a conservative approach until I understand the boundaries better. I&#8217;ve worked for private companies for seven years, so it is an adjustment.</p>
<p>I HAVE slipped some things in here and there though :-) &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James  Governor</title>
		<link>http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-13513</link>
		<dc:creator>James  Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/#comment-13513</guid>
		<description>glad to kick off this discussion. well done for taking it in the right spirit bob. seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glad to kick off this discussion. well done for taking it in the right spirit bob. seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-13267</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/#comment-13267</guid>
		<description>Maybe blogs.jboss.com sucks because most of us would rather code than blog?  Just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe blogs.jboss.com sucks because most of us would rather code than blog?  Just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Proctor</title>
		<link>http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-13176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Proctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/#comment-13176</guid>
		<description>These things already exist. We write our content over at blogspot, http://markproctor.blogspot.com/, as it has good authoring facilities and allows for visibility outside of jboss. However all our content is syndicated to the jboss rules blog at jboss.org, http://labs.jboss.com/portal/jbossrules/blog, further to that jboss.org also aggregates all the blogs that it has, http://labs.jboss.com/portal/blog?noproject=true.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These things already exist. We write our content over at blogspot, <a href="http://markproctor.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://markproctor.blogspot.com/</a>, as it has good authoring facilities and allows for visibility outside of jboss. However all our content is syndicated to the jboss rules blog at jboss.org, <a href="http://labs.jboss.com/portal/jbossrules/blog" rel="nofollow">http://labs.jboss.com/portal/jbossrules/blog</a>, further to that jboss.org also aggregates all the blogs that it has, <a href="http://labs.jboss.com/portal/blog?noproject=true" rel="nofollow">http://labs.jboss.com/portal/blog?noproject=true</a>.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McWhirter</title>
		<link>http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-13172</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McWhirter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/#comment-13172</guid>
		<description>Stephen--

Yep, exactly.  We do need one.  There is *some* aggregation going on now at JBoss.ORG, but not nearly at the level we should be doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen&#8211;</p>
<p>Yep, exactly.  We do need one.  There is *some* aggregation going on now at JBoss.ORG, but not nearly at the level we should be doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen o'grady</title>
		<link>http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-13169</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen o'grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fnokd.com/2007/03/16/jboss-blogging/#comment-13169</guid>
		<description>or how about a Planet JBoss? that would pull in the individual blogs without disrupting their current purposes and agendas. 

if there is one already, i&#039;ve missed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or how about a Planet JBoss? that would pull in the individual blogs without disrupting their current purposes and agendas. </p>
<p>if there is one already, i&#8217;ve missed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
